Core 2 Duo SP9600
VS
Core i7-3520M

Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core i7-3520M

Intel

Core 2 Duo SP9600

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-3520M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is positioned at rank 138 and the Core i7-3520M is on rank 1127, so the Core 2 Duo SP9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SP9600

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
98%
#126
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
310%
#127
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
306%
#128
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
281%
#129
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
279%
#130
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
277%
#132
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
267%
#133
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
256%
#134
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
256%
#135
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
249%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
100%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
99%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3520M

#1113
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3574%
#1114
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3521%
#1115
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3233%
#1116
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3218%
#1117
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3189%
#1119
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3079%
#1120
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2952%
#1121
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2948%
#1122
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2868%
#1125
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
100%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1128
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1129
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1130
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1132
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1133
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1134
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1135
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1136
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1137
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1140
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-3520M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo SP9600 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i7-3520M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($316)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Duo SP9600 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $316 (vs $346), it costs 9% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 9% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i7-3520M.
InsightCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i7-3520M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($316)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Core i7-3520M

Intel

Core 2 Duo SP9600

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.

Intel

Core i7-3520M

The Core i7-3520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,842 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3520M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-3520M — a 34.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-3520M (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-3520M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP9600 scores 2,836 against the Core i7-3520M's 2,842 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-3520M. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3520M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i7-3520M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
3.6 GHz+42%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz
2.9 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,836
2,842
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-3520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i7-3520M
Socket
BGA479
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo SP9600) / true (Core i7-3520M). The Core i7-3520M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3520M rivals AMD A10-5750M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i7-3520M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo SP9600 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Core i7-3520M debuted at $346.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SP9600Core i7-3520M
MSRP
$316-9%
$346
Release Date
2009
2012