
Athlon X4 750K
Popular choices:

Core 2 Duo SP9600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon X4 750K
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $225 less on MSRP ($91 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 252.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($91 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌1566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 6W.
Core 2 Duo SP9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 100W, a 94W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,836 vs 2,879).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $91 MSRP).
Athlon X4 750K
2012Core 2 Duo SP9600
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $225 less on MSRP ($91 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 252.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.6 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($91 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 100W, a 94W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌1566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,836 vs 2,879).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $91 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 750K better than Core 2 Duo SP9600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 750K and Core 2 Duo SP9600

Athlon X4 750K
Athlon X4 750K
The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo SP9600
Core 2 Duo SP9600
The Core 2 Duo SP9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,836 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 750K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 750K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — a 45% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Athlon X4 750K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750K scores 2,879 against the Core 2 Duo SP9600's 2,836 — a 1.5% lead for the Athlon X4 750K.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+58% | 2.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+34% | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB+50% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,879+2% | 2,836 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 750K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 750K launched at $91 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo SP9600 debuted at $316. On MSRP ($91 vs $316), the Athlon X4 750K is $225 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750K delivers 31.6 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo SP9600 — making the Athlon X4 750K the 111.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750K | Core 2 Duo SP9600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $91-71% | $316 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.6+251% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













