Core i5-4200M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56

Core i5-4200M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200M

2 / 4

2,809

0.0%

2,835

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Turion 64 X2 TL-56 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 X2 TL-56 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,809 vs 2,835).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-56 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-56

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-56 better than Core i5-4200M?

Yes. Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 X2 TL-56 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4200M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4200M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4200M vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

Turion 64 X2 TL-56

The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad / Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90/65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,835 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion 64 X2 TL-56's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M versus 1.8 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M. The Core i5-4200M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses Trinidad / Tyler (2007) (90/65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200M scores 2,809 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-56's 2,835 — a 0.9% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-56.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-76%	90/65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Trinidad / Tyler (2007)
PassMark	2,809	2,835

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200M	Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Socket	PGA946	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-56). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.