
FX-8800P vs Core i5-4200M

FX-8800P

Core i5-4200M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8800P is positioned at rank 903 and the Core i5-4200M is on rank 1025, so the FX-8800P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-8800P
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-8800P | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-8800P | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+404%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-8800P and Core i5-4200M

FX-8800P
The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4200M
The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The FX-8800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4200M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M — a 9.2% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The FX-8800P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4200M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8800P scores 2,833 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-8800P.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,833 | 2,809 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-8800P) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The FX-8800P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i5-4200M debuted at $225.
| Feature | FX-8800P | Core i5-4200M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-33% | $225 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | — |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















