Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 880M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 880M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 880M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 440% higher power demand at 189W vs 35W.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

2018

Why buy it

  • 323.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 35W instead of 189W, a 154W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 323.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 646.4% in PassMark G3D (1,769 vs 237), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 880M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 880M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 880M

The Quadro FX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 880M scores 237 versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 1,769 — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor leads by 646.4%. The Quadro FX 880M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 880M) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 880M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).

FeatureQuadro FX 880MRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
G3D Mark Score
237
1,769+646%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
240
704+193%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+183%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+82%
44

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 880MRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 880M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor carries 0 MB. Quadro FX 880M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 880M and System on the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.

FeatureQuadro FX 880MRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 880M draws 189W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 137.5% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 880M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro FX 880MRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
TDP
189W
35W-81%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
1.3
50.5+3785%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor (2018 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 880MRadeon RX Vega 11 Processor
MSRP
$0
Codename
GT200B
Raven
Release
November 11 2008
May 10 2018
Ranking
#815
#673

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.