
GeForce GT 415

Quadro FX 880M
GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 415
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 189W, a 119W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 880M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 880M
2008Why buy it
- ✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌170% higher power demand at 189W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro FX 880M
The Quadro FX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 415 scores 251 versus the Quadro FX 880M's 237 — the GeForce GT 415 leads by 5.9%. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro FX 880M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 240 (Quadro FX 880M). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 880M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 251+6% | 237 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 240+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+50% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 880M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 415 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 880M carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 880M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 880M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 880M) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 880M's 189W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Quadro FX 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-63% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+177% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 415 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | — |
| Codename | GF116 | GT200B |
| Release | May 14 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #849 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














