GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415

2011Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 880M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 189W, a 119W reduction.
  • More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 880M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 880M

2008

Why buy it

  • 1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 170% higher power demand at 189W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 880M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 415 instead at 251 vs 237, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 415 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 415 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 880M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 415 vs Quadro FX 880M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415

The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 880M

The Quadro FX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 415 scores 251 versus the Quadro FX 880M's 237 — the GeForce GT 415 leads by 5.9%. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro FX 880M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 240 (Quadro FX 880M). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 880M).

FeatureGeForce GT 415Quadro FX 880M
G3D Mark Score
251+6%
237
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
144
240+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4147 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 880M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 415Quadro FX 880M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 415 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 880M carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 880M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 880M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 880M) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 415Quadro FX 880M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 880M's 189W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Quadro FX 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 415Quadro FX 880M
TDP
70W-63%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.6+177%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 415 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 415Quadro FX 880M
MSRP
$49
Codename
GF116
GT200B
Release
May 14 2011
November 11 2008
Ranking
#849
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.