GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6450A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6450A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6450A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415

2011

Why buy it

✅10.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌55.6% higher power demand at 70W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6450A

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 70W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 415 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
12.2% HIGHER MSRP
$55 MSRPvs$49 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 415 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6450A instead at 260 vs 251, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 415 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 415 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $55, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 8.4% (5.1 vs 4.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6450A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415

The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 6450A

The Radeon HD 6450A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 6450A reaches 260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6450A uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6450A). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6450A).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6450A
G3D Mark Score	251	260+4%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	144	480+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4147 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+300%	48 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6450A leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6450A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6450A. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6450A) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6450A
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 6450A's 45W — a 43.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6450A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6450A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6450A
TDP	70W	45W-36%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6	5.8+61%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 6450A launched at $55. On MSRP, GeForce GT 415 was 10.9% cheaper ($6 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs 4.7 (Radeon HD 6450A) — the GeForce GT 415 offers 8.5% better value.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP	$49-11%	$55
Performance per Dollar	5.1+9%	4.7
Codename	GF116	Onega
Release	May 14 2011	April 19 2011
Ranking	#849	#926

Search GeForce GT 415 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6450A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.