GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8350G
GeForce GT 415
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8350G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 415 is positioned at rank 224 and the Radeon HD 8350G is on rank 222, so the Radeon HD 8350G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 415
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8350G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8350G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 415 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 415 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 415 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 224.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+224.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 415 and Radeon HD 8350G
GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon HD 8350G
The Radeon HD 8350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 8350G reaches 258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8350G uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350G). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 251 | 258+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 1024+611% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+325% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 415 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8350G has 0 MB. The GeForce GT 415 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8350G) — the Radeon HD 8350G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 8350G's 130W — a 60% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+80% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 415 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 8350G launched at $50 and now averages $50. The GeForce GT 415 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.7 (GeForce GT 415) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8350G) — the GeForce GT 415 offers 221.2% better value. The Radeon HD 8350G is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-70% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.7+221% | 5.2 |
| Codename | GF116 | Pitcairn |
| Release | May 14 2011 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #849 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 415 and Radeon HD 8350G
