GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6480G

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6480G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6480G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 151W, a 81W reduction.
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6480G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6480G

2010

Why buy it

✅22.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌115.7% higher power demand at 151W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6480G is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (257 vs 251), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 415 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6480G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.3% (5.1 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6480G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 415 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 6480G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415

The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 6480G

The Radeon HD 6480G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 257 points. Launch price was $239.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 6480G reaches 257 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6480G uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6480G). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6480G).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6480G
G3D Mark Score	251	257+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	144	1120+678%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4147 TFLOPS	2.016 TFLOPS+386%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	192 KB	224 KB+17%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6480G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6480G
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6480G. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6480G) — the Radeon HD 6480G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6480G
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 6480G's 151W — a 73.3% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6480G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6480G
TDP	70W-54%	151W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6+112%	1.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 6480G launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce GT 415 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs 5.1 (Radeon HD 6480G) — the Radeon HD 6480G offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 415 (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 6480G
MSRP	$49-2%	$50
Performance per Dollar	5.1	5.1
Codename	GF116	Barts
Release	May 14 2011	October 21 2010
Ranking	#849	#661

Search GeForce GT 415 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6480G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.