GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8280

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8280 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8280 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8280

2013

Why buy it

✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8280 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4% in PassMark G3D (261 vs 251), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 415 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8280 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $50 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.9% (5.2 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8280 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 415 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8280 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415

The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8280

The Radeon HD 8280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 261 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 8280 reaches 261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8280
G3D Mark Score	251	261+4%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	144	640+344%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4147 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+139%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	192 KB+20%	160 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8280 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8280
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8280) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8280
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 8280's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8280
TDP	70W	50W-29%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6	5.2+44%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 8280 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce GT 415 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8280) — the Radeon HD 8280 offers 2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8280 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8280
MSRP	$49-2%	$50
Performance per Dollar	5.1	5.2+2%
Codename	GF116	Venus
Release	May 14 2011	April 1 2013
Ranking	#849	#745

Search GeForce GT 415 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8280 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.