
GeForce GT 415

Radeon HD 4650
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 4650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 4650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 415
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 168mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 4650
2010Why buy it
- ✅24.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$70 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌15.9% longer card at 168mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 4650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 4650
The Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 4650 reaches 248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 251+1% | 248 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 1408+878% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+443% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 88+267% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 352 KB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 415 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4650 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 4650) — the Radeon HD 4650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 415) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+9% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 415) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 4650's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+200% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 4650 launched at $70. On MSRP, GeForce GT 415 was 30% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs 3.5 (Radeon HD 4650) — the GeForce GT 415 offers 45.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 415 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-30% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1+46% | 3.5 |
| Codename | GF116 | Cayman |
| Release | May 14 2011 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #849 | #623 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














