
GeForce GT 415

Radeon HD 8330E
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8330E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8330E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8330E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 415
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 175W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8330E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌63.3% HIGHER MSRP$49 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 8.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8330E
2010Why buy it
- ✅18.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 175W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8330E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8330E
The Radeon HD 8330E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 262 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 8330E reaches 262 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8330E uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8330E). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8330E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 251 | 262+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 1120+678% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+332% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+71% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8330E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8330E. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8330E) — the Radeon HD 8330E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 415) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon HD 8330E). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (FL12_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 415) vs UVD 4.2 (Radeon HD 8330E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VCE 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 415) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8330E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 4.2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 8330E's 175W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8330E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-60% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+140% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 8330E launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8330E was 38.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs 8.7 (Radeon HD 8330E) — the Radeon HD 8330E offers 70.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 415 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon HD 8330E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 8.7+71% |
| Codename | GF116 | Cypress |
| Release | May 14 2011 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #849 | #724 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














