GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8240

2012

Why buy it

✅24.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 415 instead at 251 vs 246, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 415 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 415 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4.1% (5.1 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8240 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon HD 8240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415

The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8240

The Radeon HD 8240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 246 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon HD 8240 reaches 246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8240). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8240).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8240
G3D Mark Score	251+2%	246
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	144	1280+789%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4147 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+517%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	192 KB	320 KB+67%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8240. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8240) — the Radeon HD 8240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 8240's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8240
TDP	70W-65%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6+200%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 8240 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce GT 415 was 2% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 8240) — the GeForce GT 415 offers 4.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8240 (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 415	Radeon HD 8240
MSRP	$49-2%	$50
Performance per Dollar	5.1+4%	4.9
Codename	GF116	Pitcairn
Release	May 14 2011	March 5 2012
Ranking	#849	#460

Search GeForce GT 415 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.