
GeForce GT 415

Radeon R2
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon R2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon R2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon R2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 415
2011Why buy it
- ✅7.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Radeon R2
2019Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GT 415 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R2 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 415 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 415 vs Radeon R2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R2
The Radeon R2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 254 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 415 scores 251 and the Radeon R2 reaches 254 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R2 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GT 415) vs 384 (Radeon R2). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 251 | 254+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 384+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+90% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 415 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 415 and 64-bit on the Radeon R2. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) vs 128 KB (Radeon R2) — the GeForce GT 415 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 415) vs 12_0 (Radeon R2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 415) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 415 draws 70W versus the Radeon R2's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon R2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415) vs 350W (Radeon R2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6 | 5.1+42% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 415 came in at $49, while the Radeon R2 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R2 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (GeForce GT 415) vs Infinity (Radeon R2) — the Radeon R2 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R2 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 415 | Radeon R2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF116 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | May 14 2011 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #849 | #858 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














