Quadro FX 880M vs Radeon E6465

Quadro FX 880M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Radeon E6465

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 880M

189

237

+2.6%

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon E6465

231

0.0%

Radeon HD 7310

Radeon HD 7340

Radeon HD 3450

Mobility Radeon HD 545v

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 880M is positioned at rank #127 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 880M

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

100%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

92%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

87%

#112

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1247%

#127

Quadro FX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

97%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

94%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

93%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

90%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

90%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

90%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

84%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

84%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

83%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 880M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E6465.

Insight	Quadro FX 880M	Radeon E6465
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 880M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 880M Benchmark Check

Radeon E6465 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 880M and Radeon E6465

Quadro FX 880M

The Quadro FX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon E6465

The Radeon E6465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 231 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 880M scores 237 and the Radeon E6465 reaches 231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 880M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon E6465 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 880M) vs 480 (Radeon E6465).

Feature	Quadro FX 880M	Radeon E6465
G3D Mark Score	237+3%	231
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 880M	Radeon E6465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 880M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6465 has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 880M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 880M	Radeon E6465
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 880M draws 189W versus the Radeon E6465's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon E6465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 880M) vs 350W (Radeon E6465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.