FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 1200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9370

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 151.8 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,374 vs 6,407).
❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.

Ryzen 3 1200

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike FX-9370.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.8 vs 151.8 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 1200 better than FX-9370?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-9370 is ahead with a 33.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1200 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 1200 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 1200 comes in 159.5% more expensive on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. FX-9370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 158.2% better value on paper (151.8 vs 58.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-9370 vs Ryzen 3 1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9370

The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 1200

The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 1200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 — a 32.1% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The FX-9370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9370 scores 6,374 against the Ryzen 3 1200's 6,407 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 3 1200.

Feature	FX-9370	Ryzen 3 1200
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+38%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+42%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+1500%	512K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017)
PassMark	6,374	6,407
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	3,013
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-9370	Ryzen 3 1200
Socket	AM3+	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-9370) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget.

Feature	FX-9370	Ryzen 3 1200
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-9370 was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 3 1200 came in at $109. On launch pricing ($42 vs $109), FX-9370 was $67 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9370 delivers 151.8 pts/$ vs 58.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1200 — making the FX-9370 the 88.3% better value option.

Feature	FX-9370	Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP	$42-61%	$109
Performance per Dollar	151.8+158%	58.8
Release Date	2013	2017

Search FX-9370 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 1200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.