FX-9370 vs Xeon W3670
FX-9370
Xeon W3670
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9370 is positioned at rank 61 and the Xeon W3670 is on rank 543, so the FX-9370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-9370
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3670
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-9370 | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-9370 | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+313%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-9370 and Xeon W3670
FX-9370
The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon W3670
The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.
Processing Power
The FX-9370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-9370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 — a 30.4% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The FX-9370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon W3670 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9370 scores 6,374 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W3670.
| Feature | FX-9370 | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+36% | 3.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+38% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+3100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,374 | 6,424 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9370 | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The FX-9370 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Xeon W3670 debuted at $250. At current prices ($60 vs $250), the FX-9370 is $190 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9370 delivers 106.2 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the FX-9370 the 122.1% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9370 | Xeon W3670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-83% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-76% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.2+313% | 25.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-9370 and Xeon W3670
