FX-9370 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3

FX-9370 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3 Performance Spectrum

FX-9370

8 / 8

6,374

+0.7%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1275L v3

4 / 8

6,327

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9370 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9370 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9370

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $308 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 739.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 151.8 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1275L v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌388.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1275L v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1275L v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Draws 45W instead of 220W, a 175W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics P4600, while FX-9370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,327 vs 6,374).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 151.8 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9370 better than Xeon E3-1275L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1275L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-9370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9370 is the better buy right now. FX-9370 comes in $308 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 739.5% better value on MSRP (151.8 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1275L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-9370 vs Xeon E3-1275L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9370

The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1275L v3

The Xeon E3-1275L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,327 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1275L v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275L v3 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The FX-9370 is built on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-9370 scores 6,374 against the Xeon E3-1275L v3's 6,327 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-9370.

Feature	FX-9370	Xeon E3-1275L v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+21%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+63%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	8192 kB	—
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	—
PassMark	6,374	6,327
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1275L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-9370	Xeon E3-1275L v3
Socket	AM3+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-9370) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1275L v3). The Xeon E3-1275L v3 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics P4600), while the FX-9370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1275L v3 targets Low Power Server. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1275L v3 rivals Xeon E3-1270 v3.

Feature	FX-9370	Xeon E3-1275L v3
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Low Power Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-9370 was priced at $42, while the Xeon E3-1275L v3 came in at $350. On launch pricing ($42 vs $350), FX-9370 was $308 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9370 delivers 151.8 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1275L v3 — making the FX-9370 the 157.4% better value option.

Feature	FX-9370	Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP	$42-88%	$350
Performance per Dollar	151.8+739%	18.1
Release Date	2013	2014

Search FX-9370 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1275L v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.