FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2420 v2

FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2420 v2 Performance Spectrum

FX-9370

8 / 8

6,374

+0.4%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2420 v2

6 / 12

6,349

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2420 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2420 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9370

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2420 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2420 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌175% higher power demand at 220W vs 80W.

Xeon E5-2420 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 80W instead of 220W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,349 vs 6,374).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9370 better than Xeon E5-2420 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2420 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-9370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9370 is the better buy right now. FX-9370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (151.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2420 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

FX-9370 vs Xeon E5-2420 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9370

The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2420 v2

The Xeon E5-2420 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,349 points. Launch price was $480.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2420 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-9370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2420 v2 — a 54.1% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The FX-9370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2420 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9370 scores 6,374 against the Xeon E5-2420 v2's 6,349 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-9370.

Feature	FX-9370	Xeon E5-2420 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+74%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	4.4 GHz+100%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	15 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,374	6,349

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-9370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2420 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.