
FX-9590

Ryzen 5 5600X
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
FX-9590
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,194 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than FX-9590?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-9590 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9590
The FX-9590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,194 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The FX-9590 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-9590 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the FX-9590 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 8.3% clock advantage for the FX-9590 (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The FX-9590 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-9590 scores 10,194 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 72.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+27% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+1500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 10,194 | 21,845+114% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9590 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-9590) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FX-9590 was priced at $350, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($350 vs $299), Ryzen 5 5600X was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9590 delivers 29.1 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 86% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9590 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $299-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.1 | 73.1+151% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














