
GeForce 305M

GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 305M vs GeForce 8400 GS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 305M vs GeForce 8400 GS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 305M vs GeForce 8400 GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 305M
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
GeForce 8400 GS
2014Why buy it
- ✅30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 305M vs GeForce 8400 GS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 305M
The GeForce 305M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points.

GeForce 8400 GS
The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 305M scores 151 versus the GeForce 8400 GS's 163 — the GeForce 8400 GS leads by 7.9%. The GeForce 305M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8400 GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 305M) vs 384 (GeForce 8400 GS). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 305M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 151 | 163+8% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 1124 MHz+105% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 305M and 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 GS.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 305M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 305M) vs No (GeForce 8400 GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 305M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS).
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 305M draws 33W versus the GeForce 8400 GS's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 305M) vs 350W (GeForce 8400 GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 106mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 4.9+7% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 305M (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 305M | GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $30 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #880 | #850 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














