GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 8350

NVIDIA

GeForce 305M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8350

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 8350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 8350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 8350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 305M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 130W, a 97W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8350

2012

Why buy it

  • 36.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 293.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.9% in PassMark G3D (163 vs 151), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 305M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8350 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 305M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 8350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 305M

The GeForce 305M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8350

The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 305M scores 151 versus the Radeon HD 8350's 163 — the Radeon HD 8350 leads by 7.9%. The GeForce 305M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 305M) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 305M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 305MRadeon HD 8350
G3D Mark Score
151
163+8%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+318%
Boost Clock
549 MHz
1000 MHz+82%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 305M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 305MRadeon HD 8350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 305M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 305M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8350) — the GeForce 305M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 305MRadeon HD 8350
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 305M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 8350's 130W — a 119% difference. The GeForce 305M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 305M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 305MRadeon HD 8350
TDP
33W-75%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
4.6+254%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 305M (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 305MRadeon HD 8350
MSRP
$200
Codename
GM108
Pitcairn
Release
March 13 2015
March 5 2012
Ranking
#880
#503

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.