GeForce 305M vs GeForce G210

NVIDIA

GeForce 305M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce G210

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 305M vs GeForce G210 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 305M vs GeForce G210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 305M vs GeForce G210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 305M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 305M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (151 vs 148), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 305M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G210 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce G210 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 305M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 305M vs GeForce G210 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 305M

The GeForce 305M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 305M scores 151 and the GeForce G210 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 305M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G210 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 305M) vs 384 (GeForce G210). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 305M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
G3D Mark Score
151+2%
148
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+167%
Boost Clock
549 MHz
1468 MHz+167%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 305M and 128-bit on the GeForce G210. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 305M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G210) — the GeForce 305M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 305M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_1)+10%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 305M) vs None (GeForce G210). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 305M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210).

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 305M draws 33W versus the GeForce G210's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 305M) vs 350W (GeForce G210). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 100.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-20%
100
Perf/Watt
4.6
4.9+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G210 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
MSRP
$50
Codename
GM108
GP108
Release
March 13 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#880
#641

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.