GeForce 305M
VS
GeForce G210

GeForce 305M vs GeForce G210

NVIDIA

GeForce 305M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce G210

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 305M is positioned at rank 299 and the GeForce G210 is on rank 290, so the GeForce G210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 305M

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
99%
#289
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
719%
#291
652%
#292
650%
#296
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
591%
#297
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
587%
#299
GeForce 305M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
100%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
99%
#305
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
99%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
98%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
97%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
94%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2451%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2354%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2327%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2323%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2318%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2305%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2276%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2268%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2247%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2241%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2214%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2209%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2169%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2168%
#275
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2703%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
96%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
91%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
90%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
90%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
89%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
86%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
85%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
82%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
81%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
80%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
80%
#304
Radeon HD 4290
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 305M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G210.

InsightGeForce 305MGeForce G210
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 305M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 305M and GeForce G210

NVIDIA

GeForce 305M

The GeForce 305M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 305M scores 151 and the GeForce G210 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 305M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G210 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 305M) vs 384 (GeForce G210). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 305M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
G3D Mark Score
151+2%
148
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+167%
Boost Clock
549 MHz
1468 MHz+167%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 305M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G210) — the GeForce 305M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 305M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_1)+10%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 305M) vs None (GeForce G210). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 305M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210).

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 305M draws 33W versus the GeForce G210's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 305M) vs 350W (GeForce G210). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 100.

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-20%
100
Perf/Watt
4.6
4.9+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce G210 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 305MGeForce G210
MSRP
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GM108
GP108
Release
March 13 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#880
#641