
GeForce 305M

Radeon HD 6320
GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 6320 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 6320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 305M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 186W, a 153W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6320
2011Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌463.6% higher power demand at 186W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 305M vs Radeon HD 6320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 305M
The GeForce 305M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points.

Radeon HD 6320
The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 305M scores 151 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 305M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 305M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 305M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 151+3% | 147 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+355% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 305M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 305M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 305M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6320) — the GeForce 305M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 305M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 305M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 305M) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320).
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 305M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 305M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 305M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6+475% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 305M (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 305M | Radeon HD 6320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $30 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 13 2015 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #880 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














