GeForce 305M vs Radeon R5 220

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 305M vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 305M vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 305M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 275W, a 242W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 220

2013

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 220 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 305M instead at 151 vs 147, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 305M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 220 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 220 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 305M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 305M vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 305M

The GeForce 305M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points.

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 305M scores 151 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 305M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 305M) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 305M) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score	151+3%	147
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	4.849 TFLOPS+1050%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L1 Cache	192 KB	640 KB+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 305M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 220 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 305M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 305M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220.

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 305M) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
DirectX	10.1	11.2+11%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 305M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 220). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 305M draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce 305M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 305M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
TDP	33W-88%	275W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.6+820%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 305M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 305M	Radeon R5 220
MSRP	—	$35
Codename	GM108	Hawaii
Release	March 13 2015	November 5 2013
Ranking	#880	#316

Search GeForce 305M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.