GeForce 505 vs GeForce GT 130M
GeForce 505
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 130M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 505 is positioned at rank 674 and the GeForce GT 130M is on rank 131, so the GeForce GT 130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 505
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 505 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce 505 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 130M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 130M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 505.
| Insight | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 130M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 505 and GeForce GT 130M
GeForce 505
The GeForce 505 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
GeForce GT 130M
The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 505 scores 144 and the GeForce GT 130M reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 505 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GT 130M uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 505) vs 384 (GeForce GT 130M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 505) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144 | 145 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+320% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1468 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1329% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 505 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 130M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 130M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 505) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 130M) — the GeForce 505 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 505) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 505) vs No (GeForce GT 130M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 505) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M).
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 505 draws 25W versus the GeForce GT 130M's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce 505 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 505) vs 350W (GeForce GT 130M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 64mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+21% | 4.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 505 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce 505 | GeForce GT 130M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | GP108 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #407 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 505 and GeForce GT 130M
