
GeForce 505

Quadro 400
GeForce 505 vs Quadro 400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 505 vs Quadro 400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 505 vs Quadro 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 505
2022Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro 400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 505 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quadro 400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 505 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌70.7% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 505 vs Quadro 400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 505
The GeForce 505 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 505 scores 144 and the Quadro 400 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 505 is built on Ampere while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 505) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 505) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1252 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144 | 148+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+700% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+638% | 0.641 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1252 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+300% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+2122% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 505 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 505 and 64-bit on the Quadro 400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 505) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) — the GeForce 505 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 505) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 505 draws 25W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce 505 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 505) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+18% | 4.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 505 came in at $99, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce 505 was 41.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GeForce 505) vs 0.9 (Quadro 400) — the GeForce 505 offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 505 (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce 505 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-41% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5+67% | 0.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP107 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #407 | #741 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














