
GeForce 610M
Popular choices:

GeForce 9700M GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 610M is positioned at rank #49 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 610M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 610M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9700M GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9700M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 610M.
| Insight | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9700M GTS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 610M and GeForce 9700M GTS

GeForce 610M
The GeForce 610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

GeForce 9700M GTS
The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 610M scores 292 versus the GeForce 9700M GTS's 312 — the GeForce 9700M GTS leads by 6.8%. The GeForce 610M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9700M GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 610M) vs 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS).
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 292 | 312+7% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 610M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.1+24% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 610M) vs None (GeForce 9700M GTS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 610M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9700M GTS).
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 610M draws 33W versus the GeForce 9700M GTS's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 610M) vs 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90.
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-11% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 8.8+319% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9700M GTS costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.6 (GeForce 610M) vs Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) — the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 610M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 610M | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #847 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















