CPU
GPU
GeForce 510
Popular choices:
GeForce 610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank 592 and the GeForce 610M is on rank 49, so the GeForce 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 510 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce 510 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 610M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the GeForce 610M, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and GeForce 610M
GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
GeForce 610M
The GeForce 610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the GeForce 610M reaches 292 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GeForce 610M uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 384 (GeForce 610M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 610M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 292 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+424% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1176 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 40+400% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 610M has 512 MB. The GeForce 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 1 MB (GeForce 610M) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 11.0 (GeForce 610M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs No (GeForce 610M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 610M).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GeForce 610M's 33W — a 27.6% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (GeForce 610M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-24% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 64mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6+32% | 8.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs 14.6 (GeForce 610M) — the GeForce 510 offers 32.2% better value. The GeForce 510 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GeForce 610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3+32% | 14.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM108 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #407 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 510 and GeForce 610M
