GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 415M

NVIDIA

GeForce 510

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 415M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 415M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 415M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

  • 60.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GeForce GT 415M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GeForce GT 415M

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 510 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (290 vs 286), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 510 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 415M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

The GeForce GT 415M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 286 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the GeForce GT 415M reaches 286 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GT 415M uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 384 (GeForce GT 415M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415M).

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
G3D Mark Score
290+1%
286
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS+1022%
0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
2 MB+6567%
0.03 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 415M carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 415M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 415M) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 415M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
DirectX
11.0
11.0
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
4.1+2%
4.0
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs No (GeForce GT 415M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 415M).

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GeForce GT 415M's 45W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (GeForce GT 415M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
TDP
25W-44%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
64mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
11.6+81%
6.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 510GeForce GT 415M
MSRP
$99
Codename
GA107
GK107
Release
Maio 2022
April 1 2013
Ranking
#407
#857

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.