G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 520MX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 520MX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

✅47.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅GeForce GT 520MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
120% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).

GeForce GT 520MX

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 510 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 520MX instead at 291 vs 290, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 520MX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $54 cheaper on MSRP at $45 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 120.8% (6.5 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 520MX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 510 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 510 vs GeForce GT 520MX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

GeForce GT 520MX

The GeForce GT 520MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 291 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the GeForce GT 520MX reaches 291 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GeForce GT 520MX uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 384 (GeForce GT 520MX). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520MX). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 967 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
G3D Mark Score	290	291
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+537%	0.7427 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz+19%	967 MHz
ROPs	40+150%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	2 MB+6567%	0.03 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 520MX carries 1 GB. GeForce 510 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520MX. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 520MX) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520MX). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
DirectX	11.0	11.0
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	4.1+2%	4.0
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs No (GeForce GT 520MX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520MX).

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GeForce GT 520MX's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (GeForce GT 520MX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	64mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	11.6+100%	5.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the GeForce GT 520MX launched at $45. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520MX was 54.5% cheaper ($54 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs 6.5 (GeForce GT 520MX) — the GeForce GT 520MX offers 124.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 510	GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP	$99	$45-55%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	6.5+124%
Codename	GA107	GK107
Release	Maio 2022	January 9 2013
Ranking	#407	#792

Search GeForce 510 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 520MX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.