
GeForce 510
Popular choices:

Radeon R1E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank #592 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R1E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon R1E, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 214.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+214.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and Radeon R1E

GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Radeon R1E
The Radeon R1E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 301 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the Radeon R1E reaches 301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R1E uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 128 (Radeon R1E). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon R1E). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce 510) vs 2 (Radeon R1E) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 301+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+1500% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+740% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2200 MHz+90% |
| ROPs | 40+900% | 4 |
| TMUs | 64+700% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+6567% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+700% | 2 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R1E has 512 MB. The GeForce 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12 (Radeon R1E). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5+10% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R1E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC (Radeon R1E).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Radeon R1E's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R1E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Radeon R1E). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6 | 20.1+73% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R1E launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce 510 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs 6.1 (Radeon R1E) — the GeForce 510 offers 216.4% better value. The Radeon R1E is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3+216% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Dragon Range |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #407 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















