
GeForce 510

Radeon R1E
GeForce 510 vs Radeon R1E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 510 vs Radeon R1E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 510 vs Radeon R1E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 510
2022Why buy it
- ✅12.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
Radeon R1E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 510 vs Radeon R1E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Radeon R1E
The Radeon R1E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 301 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the Radeon R1E reaches 301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R1E uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 128 (Radeon R1E). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon R1E). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce 510) vs 2 (Radeon R1E) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 301+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+1500% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+740% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2200 MHz+90% |
| ROPs | 40+900% | 4 |
| TMUs | 64+700% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+6567% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+700% | 2 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R1E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R1E carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 64-bit on the Radeon R1E.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12 (Radeon R1E). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5+10% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R1E). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC (Radeon R1E).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Radeon R1E's 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R1E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Radeon R1E). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6 | 20.1+73% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the Radeon R1E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R1E was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs Infinity (Radeon R1E) — the Radeon R1E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R1E (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Radeon R1E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | Dragon Range |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #407 | #843 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















