GeForce 510
GRID K120Q
GeForce 510 vs GRID K120Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 510 vs GRID K120Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 510 vs GRID K120Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 510
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅GRID K120Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GRID K120Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌26.3% HIGHER MSRP$125 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 510 vs GRID K120Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
GRID K120Q
The GRID K120Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 293 points. Launch price was $937.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the GRID K120Q reaches 293 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GRID K120Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 1,536 (GRID K120Q). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K120Q).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 293+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+107% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K120Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K120Q carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 64-bit on the GRID K120Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K120Q) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID K120Q). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs NVENC 1 (GRID K120Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K120Q).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GRID K120Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (GRID K120Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6+792% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the GRID K120Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GeForce 510 was 20.8% cheaper ($26 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs 2.3 (GRID K120Q) — the GeForce 510 offers 26.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-21% | $125 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9+26% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GK104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #407 | #589 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 510 and GRID K120Q
