CPU
GPU
GeForce 510
Popular choices:
GRID K120Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank 592 and the GRID K120Q is on rank 276, so the GRID K120Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar GRID K120Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 510 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The GeForce 510 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K120Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K120Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the GRID K120Q, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and GRID K120Q
GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
GRID K120Q
The GRID K120Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 293 points. Launch price was $937.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the GRID K120Q reaches 293 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the GRID K120Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 1,536 (GRID K120Q). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K120Q).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 293+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+107% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K120Q has 512 MB. The GeForce 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K120Q) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID K120Q). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs NVENC 1 (GRID K120Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K120Q).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the GRID K120Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (GRID K120Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6+792% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID K120Q launched at $125 and now averages $20. The GeForce 510 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs 14.7 (GRID K120Q) — the GeForce 510 offers 31.3% better value. The GeForce 510 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | GRID K120Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-21% | $125 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3+31% | 14.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | GK104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #407 | #589 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 510 and GRID K120Q
