
GeForce 510
Popular choices:

Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank #592 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU

GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU reaches 292 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 292 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU has 0 MB. The GeForce 510 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU's 7W — a 112.5% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 7W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6 | 41.7+259% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 510 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | — |
| Release | Maio 2022 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #407 | #860 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















