
GeForce 510
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 510 is positioned at rank #592 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 510 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce 510 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.6%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 510 and Intel UHD Graphics 600

GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 510 scores 290 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 312 — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 leads by 7.6%. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 290 | 312+8% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+1073% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+10% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+1233% | 3 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB. The GeForce 510 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QSV. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | QSV |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | QSV |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 50% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 55°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.6 | 20.8+79% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 510 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce 510) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 510 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #407 | #703 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















