GeForce 510 vs Quadro FX 3500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs Quadro FX 3500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs Quadro FX 3500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

✅6.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Quadro FX 3500M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 189W, a 164W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro FX 3500M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌656% higher power demand at 189W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 510 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 3500M instead at 306 vs 290, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 55nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 510 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 510 vs Quadro FX 3500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 510 scores 290 versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 306 — the Quadro FX 3500M leads by 5.5%. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 3500M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M).

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
G3D Mark Score	290	306+6%
Architecture	Ampere	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2048+753%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+660%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3500M carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500M) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M). OpenGL: 4.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
DirectX	11.0+22%	9.0c
OpenGL	4.1+95%	2.1
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs None (Quadro FX 3500M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VP1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M).

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	VP1
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Quadro FX 3500M's 189W — a 153.3% difference. The GeForce 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
TDP	25W-87%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	11.6+625%	1.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 510	Quadro FX 3500M
MSRP	$99	—
Codename	GA107	GT200B
Release	Maio 2022	November 11 2008
Ranking	#407	#815

Search GeForce 510 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3500M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.