GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2900 GT

CPU

GPU

GeForce 510

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 2900 GT

2013Core: 725 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2900 GT Performance Spectrum

GeForce 510

2 GB 25

290

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon HD 2900 GT

0.5 GB 25

292

+0.7%

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

Radeon RX 6550M

Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2900 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2900 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 510

2022

Why buy it

✅45.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Radeon HD 2900 GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 510 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon HD 2900 GT

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 510 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
71.7% HIGHER MSRP
$170 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 510 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 2900 GT instead at 292 vs 290, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 510 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $71 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $170, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 70.5% (2.9 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 510 vs Radeon HD 2900 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 510

The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.

Radeon HD 2900 GT

The Radeon HD 2900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 510 scores 290 and the Radeon HD 2900 GT reaches 292 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 510 is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 2900 GT uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 510) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 GT).

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
G3D Mark Score	290	292
Architecture	Ampere	TeraScale 2
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+327%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+580%	0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+400%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L1 Cache	2 MB+3900%	0.05 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 510 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2900 GT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2900 GT carries 512 MB. GeForce 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 510 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2900 GT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 510) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2900 GT) — the GeForce 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 510) vs 10 (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
DirectX	11.0+10%	10
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 510) vs UVD (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
Encoder	No	UVD
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 510 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 2900 GT's 25W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
TDP	25W	25W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	241mm
Height	64mm	—
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.6	11.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 510 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 2900 GT launched at $170. On MSRP, GeForce 510 was 41.8% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce 510) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 2900 GT) — the GeForce 510 offers 70.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 510 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 510	Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP	$99-42%	$170
Performance per Dollar	2.9+71%	1.7
Codename	GA107	Thames
Release	Maio 2022	January 7 2013
Ranking	#407	#883

Search GeForce 510 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2900 GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.