GeForce 6150 LE vs MOBILITY RADEON X300
GeForce 6150 LE
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6150 LE is positioned at rank 688 and the MOBILITY RADEON X300 is on rank 716, so the GeForce 6150 LE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150 LE
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6150 LE is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce 6150 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6150 LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON X300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6150 LE and MOBILITY RADEON X300
GeForce 6150 LE
The GeForce 6150 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
MOBILITY RADEON X300
The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6150 LE scores 33 and the MOBILITY RADEON X300 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6150 LE is built on Pascal while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X300).
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 34+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+40% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+80% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6150 LE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 has 128 MB. The GeForce 6150 LE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X300) — the GeForce 6150 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X300). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6150 LE draws 10W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X300's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 6150 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-80% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.3+371% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6150 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers 3% better value. The GeForce 6150 LE is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-40% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 3.4+3% |
| Codename | GP108 | Broadway |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #657 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6150 LE and MOBILITY RADEON X300
