
GeForce 6150 LE
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6150 LE is positioned at rank 688 and the Quadro FX 1300 is on rank 421, so the Quadro FX 1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150 LE
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6150 LE is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce 6150 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6150 LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6150 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6150 LE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 45.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6150 LE and Quadro FX 1300

GeForce 6150 LE
The GeForce 6150 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

Quadro FX 1300
The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6150 LE scores 33 and the Quadro FX 1300 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6150 LE is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 1300 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300).
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 34+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+28% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6150 LE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1300 has 128 MB. The GeForce 6150 LE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) — the GeForce 6150 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6150 LE draws 10W versus the Quadro FX 1300's 189W — a 179.9% difference. The GeForce 6150 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-95% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.3+1550% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6150 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 and now averages $15. The GeForce 6150 LE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (GeForce 6150 LE) vs 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) — the GeForce 6150 LE offers 43.5% better value. The GeForce 6150 LE is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6150 LE | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-95% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3+43% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GP108 | GT200B |
| Release | May 17 2017 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #657 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












