GeForce 6600 GT vs Radeon HD 6300M

NVIDIA

GeForce 6600 GT

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6300M

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 6600 GT vs Radeon HD 6300M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6600 GT vs Radeon HD 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6600 GT vs Radeon HD 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6600 GT

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 186W, a 36W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6300M

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 24% higher power demand at 186W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6300M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (144 vs 143), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 6600 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6600 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6300M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6600 GT vs Radeon HD 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6600 GT

The GeForce 6600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon HD 6300M

The Radeon HD 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6600 GT scores 143 and the Radeon HD 6300M reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 GT is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6300M uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6300M). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6300M).

FeatureGeForce 6600 GTRadeon HD 6300M
G3D Mark Score
143
144
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1344+5%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS+37%
1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
112+40%
80
L1 Cache
112 KB
320 KB+186%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6600 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6600 GTRadeon HD 6300M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6600 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6300M carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6300M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6600 GT and System on the Radeon HD 6300M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6300M) — the Radeon HD 6300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6600 GTRadeon HD 6300M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6600 GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6300M's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce 6600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 6600 GTRadeon HD 6300M
TDP
150W-19%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
183mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
1.0+25%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 6600 GT (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 6600 GTRadeon HD 6300M
MSRP
$199
Codename
GK104
Cayman
Release
August 16 2012
December 1 2011
Ranking
#472
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.