GeForce 6600 GT vs RADEON HD 6350
GeForce 6600 GT
Popular choices:
RADEON HD 6350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6600 GT is positioned at rank 340 and the RADEON HD 6350 is on rank 240, so the RADEON HD 6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600 GT
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD 6350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6600 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON HD 6350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD 6350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the RADEON HD 6350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6600 GT and RADEON HD 6350
GeForce 6600 GT
The GeForce 6600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points. Launch price was $299.
RADEON HD 6350
The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6600 GT scores 143 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 GT is built on Kepler while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD 6350).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 143+1% | 141 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+5% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS+37% | 1.92 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 320 KB+186% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6600 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD 6350 has 512 MB. The RADEON HD 6350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 512 KB (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 11.2 (11_0) (RADEON HD 6350). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.2 (11_0)+24% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4+110% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6600 GT) vs None (RADEON HD 6350). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6600 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (RADEON HD 6350).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6600 GT draws 150W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce 6600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 183mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 183mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+25% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6600 GT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30 and now averages $30. The RADEON HD 6350 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.9 (GeForce 6600 GT) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 offers 62.1% better value. The GeForce 6600 GT is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $30-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 4.7+62% |
| Codename | GK104 | Cayman |
| Release | August 16 2012 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #472 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6600 GT and RADEON HD 6350
