GeForce 6800 GT vs GeForce 310
GeForce 6800 GT
Popular choices:
GeForce 310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6800 GT is positioned at rank 728 and the GeForce 310 is on rank 577, so the GeForce 310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6800 GT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 310 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6800 GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6800 GT.
| Insight | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $40), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 705.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+705.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6800 GT and GeForce 310
GeForce 6800 GT
The GeForce 6800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.
GeForce 310
The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6800 GT scores 142 and the GeForce 310 reaches 143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6800 GT is built on G9x while the GeForce 310 uses Maxwell, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 384 (GeForce 310).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 142 | 143 |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 384+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6800 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 310 has 512 MB. The GeForce 310 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 10.1 (GeForce 310). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.1+12% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6800 GT) vs None (GeForce 310). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6800 GT draws 150W versus the GeForce 310's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 350W (GeForce 310). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 216mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 216mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 4.3+378% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6800 GT launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce 310 launched at $45 and now averages $5. The GeForce 310 costs 87.5% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.5 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 28.6 (GeForce 310) — the GeForce 310 offers 717.1% better value. The GeForce 310 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $45-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $5-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 28.6+717% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GM108 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #825 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6800 GT and GeForce 310
