GeForce 6800 GT vs GeForce GT 130M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6800 GT vs GeForce GT 130M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6800 GT vs GeForce GT 130M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6800 GT

2008

Why buy it

✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 130M

2017

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 6800 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 6800 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 130M instead at 145 vs 142, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6800 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6800 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 6800 GT vs GeForce GT 130M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6800 GT

The GeForce 6800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6800 GT scores 142 and the GeForce GT 130M reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6800 GT is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 130M uses Pascal, both on 65 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 384 (GeForce GT 130M).

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
G3D Mark Score	142	145+2%
Architecture	G9x	Pascal
Process Node	65 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	224	384+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6800 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 130M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 130M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 6800 GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130M.

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	1 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
DirectX	9.0c	10.1+12%
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	2.1	3.3+57%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6800 GT) vs No (GeForce GT 130M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M).

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6800 GT draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 130M's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 350W (GeForce GT 130M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	216mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	0.9	4.8+433%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 130M (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 6800 GT	GeForce GT 130M
MSRP	$399	—
Codename	NB9E-GTX	GP108
Release	July 15 2008	May 17 2017
Ranking	#825	#641

Search GeForce 6800 GT on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 130M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.