GeForce 6800 GT vs Radeon R5 220 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6800 GT vs Radeon R5 220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6800 GT vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6800 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 220 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1040% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
Radeon R5 220
2013Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $364 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1080.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6800 GT vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6800 GT
The GeForce 6800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

Radeon R5 220
The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6800 GT scores 142 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6800 GT is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 142 | 147+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 2560+1043% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6800 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 220 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6800 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 220 carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 220 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 6800 GT and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 1 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.2+24% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6800 GT) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 220). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6800 GT draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce 6800 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-45% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+80% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6800 GT came in at $399, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 91.2% cheaper ($364 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GeForce 6800 GT) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 950% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 220 (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GT | Radeon R5 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $35-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 4.2+950% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Hawaii |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #825 | #316 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















