GeForce 705M vs GeForce GT 320

NVIDIA

GeForce 705M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 705M vs GeForce GT 320 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 705M vs GeForce GT 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 705M vs GeForce GT 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 705M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 320

2017

Why buy it

  • 4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (470 vs 456), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 705M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 705M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 705M vs GeForce GT 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 705M

The GeForce 705M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 456 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320

The GeForce GT 320 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 470 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 705M scores 456 and the GeForce GT 320 reaches 470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 705M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 320 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 705M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 320). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 705M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
G3D Mark Score
456
470+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+16%
1.127 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1468 MHz+44%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+122%
144 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 705M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 320 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 320 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 705M and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 705M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 320) — the GeForce 705M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 705M) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 320). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
DirectX
11.0+9%
10.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.1+24%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 705M) vs None (GeForce GT 320). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 705M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 320).

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 705M draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 320's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 705M) vs 250W (GeForce GT 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
0mm
175mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75-6%
Perf/Watt
6.1
15.7+157%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce GT 320
MSRP
$79
Codename
GM107
GP108
Release
October 27 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#671
#641

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.