GeForce 705M vs Radeon R5 M240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 705M vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 705M vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 705M

2015

Why buy it

✅36.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 705M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 705M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M240 instead at 473 vs 456, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 705M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 705M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 705M vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 705M

The GeForce 705M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 456 points.

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 705M scores 456 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 705M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 705M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 705M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 780 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score	456	473+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+100%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS+192%	0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1020 MHz+31%	780 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+100%	20
L1 Cache	320 KB+300%	80 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 705M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 705M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 705M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 M240) — the GeForce 705M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 705M) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
DirectX	11.0	12+9%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 705M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
Encoder	No	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 705M draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 705M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Mobile
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.1	15.8+159%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 705M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 705M	Radeon R5 M240
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GM107	Oland
Release	October 27 2015	October 8 2013
Ranking	#671	#911

Search GeForce 705M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.