GeForce 705M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

NVIDIA

GeForce 705M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce 705M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 705M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 705M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 705M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 926.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 926.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2257.2% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 456), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 705M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 705M

The GeForce 705M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 456 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 705M scores 456 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 2257.2%. The GeForce 705M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 705M) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 705M) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1020 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
456
10,749+2257%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
640
2304+260%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+419%
Boost Clock
1020 MHz
1470 MHz+44%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
72+80%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
2.3 MB+642%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 705M is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 705M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 705M and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
168 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit+33%
96-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 705M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
11.0
12 Ultimate+9%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 705M) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 705M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
No
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 705M draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 705M) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
75W
70W-7%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
0mm
160mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
6.1
153.6+2418%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 705MGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$169
Codename
GM107
GA107
Release
October 27 2015
February 2 2024
Ranking
#671
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.