
GeForce 720A

GeForce GTS 250
GeForce 720A vs GeForce GTS 250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 720A vs GeForce GTS 250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 720A vs GeForce GTS 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 720A
2015Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 336% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 106W, a 73W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTS 250
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 720A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌330% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌221.2% higher power demand at 106W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 720A vs GeForce GTS 250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 720A
The GeForce 720A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 577 points.

GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 720A scores 577 and the GeForce GTS 250 reaches 569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 720A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTS 250 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 720A) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 250). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 720A) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250).
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 577+1% | 569 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS+20% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 720A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 250 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTS 250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 720A and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 720A) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 250) — the GeForce 720A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 720A) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce 720A) vs PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250). Decoder: NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 720A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 250).
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 720A draws 33W versus the GeForce GTS 250's 106W — a 105% difference. The GeForce 720A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 720A) vs 450W (GeForce GTS 250). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-69% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85-6% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5+224% | 5.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 720A came in at $30, while the GeForce GTS 250 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce 720A was 76.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.2 (GeForce 720A) vs 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) — the GeForce 720A offers 336.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 720A (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-77% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2+336% | 4.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | GF106 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #810 | #791 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














