
GeForce 720A
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 720A is positioned at rank 252 and the Radeon R7 M360 is on rank 234, so the Radeon R7 M360 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 720A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 720A.
| Insight | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 720A and Radeon R7 M360

GeForce 720A
The GeForce 720A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 577 points.

Radeon R7 M360
The Radeon R7 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 720A scores 577 and the Radeon R7 M360 reaches 585 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 720A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M360 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 720A) vs 768 (Radeon R7 M360). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 720A) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M360). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 577 | 585+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.613 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1000 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 720A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M360 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M360 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 720A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M360) — the GeForce 720A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 720A) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M360). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce 720A) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M360). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 720A) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 720A draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M360's 80W — a 83.2% difference. The GeForce 720A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 720A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M360). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-59% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5+140% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 720A launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R7 M360 launched at $120 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.2 (GeForce 720A) vs 19.5 (Radeon R7 M360) — the Radeon R7 M360 offers 1.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 720A | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-75% | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 19.5+2% |
| Codename | GM108 | Tobago |
| Release | March 13 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #810 | #576 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












