GeForce 720A vs Radeon R5 A240

NVIDIA

GeForce 720A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 A240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 720A vs Radeon R5 A240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 720A vs Radeon R5 A240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 720A vs Radeon R5 A240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 720A

2015

Why buy it

  • 48.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 233.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 A240

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 720A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 720A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (577 vs 576), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 720A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 720A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 233.9% (19.2 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 720A vs Radeon R5 A240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 720A

The GeForce 720A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 577 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 A240

The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 720A scores 577 and the Radeon R5 A240 reaches 576 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 720A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 A240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 720A) vs 320 (Radeon R5 A240). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 720A) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A240). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 780 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 720ARadeon R5 A240
G3D Mark Score
577
576
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS+61%
0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
941 MHz+21%
780 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24+20%
20
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 720A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 720ARadeon R5 A240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 720A and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 720A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 A240) — the GeForce 720A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 720ARadeon R5 A240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 720A draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 A240's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 720A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A240). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

FeatureGeForce 720ARadeon R5 A240
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
17.5
19.2+10%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 720A came in at $30, while the Radeon R5 A240 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 720A was 70% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.2 (GeForce 720A) vs 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) — the GeForce 720A offers 231% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 720A (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 720ARadeon R5 A240
MSRP
$30-70%
$100
Performance per Dollar
19.2+231%
5.8
Codename
GM108
Oland
Release
March 13 2015
October 8 2013
Ranking
#810
#911

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.